Last update:
2020-08-19

Shenhua's water intensive coal chemical project in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China

On 23rd July 2013, Greenpeace published a report titled “Thirsty Coal 2: Shenhua’s Water Grab”, which put the excessive water extraction and illegal wastewater discharge of China Shenhua’s Coal-to-Liquid project in Ordors, Inner Mongolia under scrutiny.



Description:

On 23rd July 2013, Greenpeace published a report titled “Thirsty Coal 2: Shenhua’s Water Grab”, which put China Shenhua Energy Company Limited (China Shenhua)’s Coal-to-Liquid (CTL) Demonstration Project in Ordors, Inner Mongolia under scrutiny. The report, based on 11 site investigation trips by Greenpeace representatives between March and July 2013, disclosed the CTL project’s over-exploitation of groundwater and illegal wastewater discharge activities. [1] It was the first time that Greenpeace singled out and publicly challenged one of China’s most powerful state-owned enterprises. [2]

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Shenhua's water intensive coal chemical project in Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China
Country:China
State or province:Inner Mongolia
Location of conflict:Haolebaoji Township, Wushenzhao Town, Uxin Banner, Ordors
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Coal extraction and processing
Water access rights and entitlements
Chemical industries
Specific commodities:Coal
Diesel, naphtha, liquefied petroleum gas, crude phenol and industrial sulfur. [5] 
Water
Chemical products
Project Details and Actors
Project details

China Shenhua is the largest state-owned coal conglomerate in China. Commenced in 2002 [3] and located at Majiata Village in Ulan Moron Town (乌兰木伦镇) in Ordos which borders Shaanxi Province, Shenhua’s CTL project is one of the first and largest of its kind in China and also in the world, involving both direct and indirect liquefaction facilities. The CTL production base covers a total area of 1.735 square kilometers (173.5 hectares).[4]

See more
Project area:173.5 hectares
Level of Investment for the conflictive projectUSD 3.57 billion (CNY 24.54 billion) for the first phase
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:5,752 people (2,402 households in Haolebaoji area)
Start of the conflict:01/01/2015
Company names or state enterprises:China Shenhua Energy Company Limited (神华集团有限责任公司) (China Shenhua/Shenhua) from China - Owner of the CTL project, responsible for the water extraction and wastewater discharge activities
China Shenhua Coal Liquefaction and Chemical Co Ltd (中国神华煤制油化工有限公司) from China - Operating company of the CTL project, responsible for the water extraction and wastewater discharge activities
China Energy Investment Corporation (国家能源投资集团) (CEIC) from China - The company was created after the project/conflict had already started. The company mainly responsible (Shenhua) is now part of CEIC.
Relevant government actors:- Ordos municipality (鄂尔多斯市政府)
- Uxin Banner government (乌审旗政府)
- NPC standing committee in Ordos (鄂尔多斯人大常委会)
- Ejin Horo Banner Environmental Protection Bureau (伊金霍洛旗环保局)
- Ordos Environmental Protection Bureau (鄂尔多斯市环保局)
- Dongcheng District People’s Court in Beijing (北京东城区人民法院)
- Intermediate People’s Courte in Inner Mongolia (内蒙古中级人民法院)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:- Greenpeace East Asia (https://www.greenpeace.org.cn/) and Greenpeace International (https://www.greenpeace.org/international/)
- Nature University (自然大学)
- Centre for Legal Advice for Pollution Victims (污染受害者法律帮助中心) http://www.clapv.org/
- Xie Yan, researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Zoology
Conflict & Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
International ejos
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Pastoralists
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Blockades
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Impacts
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Health ImpactsPotential: Other Health impacts
Other Health impactsWhile there was no reported visible health impact in the area, the wastewater sample test shows that there are high volumes of hazardous chemicals in the discharged water, which may have health impacts on the local residents and their livestock.
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of livelihood, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Displacement
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Court decision (failure for environmental justice)
Negotiated alternative solution
Technical solutions to improve resource supply/quality/distribution
A legal case was filed but two courts refused to hear the case.
Proposal and development of alternatives:In April 2014, almost a year after Greenpeace's publication of the report, the local government of Haolebaoji announced that Shenhua would stop pumping groundwater in the neighborhood during 2014. [10] Besides, the herders living near water sources in Haolebaoji Township were told by the local government that they would be paid CNY 20,000 (USD 3,200) per person, plus 20,000 per household, as a compensation for loss of water resources to industry, to be paid over three years. [9] In addition, Shenhua pledged that it had fitted the Ordos site with equipment that would allow it to recycle 98% of the water used there and that the water with high concentrations of pollutants would be treated in evaporation ponds.[17]
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:It was the first time that Greenpeace confronted a state-owned coal conglomerate in China, which also led to the first time that a state-owned enterprise like Shenhua responded to an NGO’s request and inquiry. To some extent, this is a successful campaign and a milestone. However, local residents still expressed their lack of trust and confidence in the behavior of the corporate due to almost 10 years’ of ongoing petition and resistance that went in vain. Besides, the water access issue that has caused a long-term impact on local residents’ livelihood, including farming activities and their health, could not be resolved in a short term or via financial compensation over just three years. Besides, the public interest litigation related to this case was rejected by two courts, which reflects the challenge in seeking environmental justice through the legal system.
Sources & Materials
Juridical relevant texts related to the conflict (laws, legislations, EIAs, etc)

The Legal Procedure Law of P.R. China (中华人民共和国民事诉讼法), Article 55: For conduct that pollutes environment, infringes upon the lawful rights and interests of vast consumers or otherwise damages the public interest, an authority or relevant organization as prescribed by law may institute an action in a people's court. Where the people's procuratorate finds in the performance of functions any conduct that undermines the protection of the ecological environment and resources, infringes upon consumers' lawful rights and interests in the field of food and drug safety or any other conduct that damages social interest, it may file a lawsuit with the people's court if there is no authority or organization prescribed in the preceding paragraph or the authority or organization prescribed in the preceding paragraph does not file a lawsuit. If the authority or organization prescribed in the preceding paragraph files a lawsuit, the people's procuratorate may support the filing of a lawsuit.
[click to view]

Grassland Law of P.R. China (中华 人民共和国草原法)
[click to view]

Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和 国水污染防治法), Article 41 of the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China, passed in 1984 and revised in 1996, prohibits enterprises and public units from discharging wastewater containing toxic pollutants, polluted water containing pathogens or other waste material into seepage wells, seepage pits or caves. Article 42 of the same law states that in areas that are not naturally isolated, enterprises and public units are prohibited from using ditches and pools without proper anti-seepage features to transport or store toxic pollutants, polluted water containing pathogens or other waste materials.
[click to view]

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Environmental Protection Regulations (内蒙古自治区环境保护条例), Article 28 of the 2002 revised Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Environmental Protection Regulations states that clean water and wastewater being discharged from industrial processes must be separated, processed independently and reused. Ditches or pools used to transport or store wastewater containing toxic pollutants, polluted water containing pathogens or other waste materials must be treated with anti- seepage techniques.
[click to view]

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Administrative Measures for Groundwater Management (Pending) (内蒙古自 治区地下水管理办法(征求意见稿)), Article 31 of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Administrative Measures for Groundwater Management (Pending) published on January 4th, 2013, states that the storage or transport of wastewater containing toxic pollutants, polluted water containing pathogens or other waste materials that may pollute groundwater must meet national regulations for the prevention of seepage, in order to protect the quality of groundwater. Anti-seepage projects must include groundwater monitoring facilities that are inspected and approved by water administration agencies before being used. Article 32 states that it is prohibited to use seepage wells, seepage pits or crevices to discharge or dump industrial wastewater, residential wastewater, toxic wastewater and other waste materials that may pollute groundwater; it is also prohibited to use aquifer pores, crevices or abandoned mining pits to store oil, radioactive materials, toxic chemicals or fertilizers.

Water Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国水法), According to Article 28 of the Water Law of the People's Republic of China, no unit or individual may divert, block (store) or drain water in such a way that harms the public interest or the legal rights of others. Administrative Regulations on Water Extraction Licensing and Water Resource Fees issued by the State Council state that reviews of applications for extraction licenses must take into consideration affected parties (in this case, the villagers of Haolebaoji).
[click to view]

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

A short documentary made by Greenpeace (2013) including interviews with local herders that were affected by the water extraction activities of China Shenhua in Ordos since 2003.
[click to view]

[1] “《噬水之煤》,” Greenpeace East Asia, Jul. 23, 2013. (accessed Aug. 28, 2020).
[click to view]

[2] D. Patton and F. Wong, “China’s Shenhua drains groundwater for coal project-Greenpeace,” Reuters, Jul. 23, 2013. (accessed Aug. 19, 2020).
[click to view]

[3] C. Quek, “Coal-to-Chemicals: Shenhua’s Water Grab,” China Water Risk, Aug. 07, 2013. (accessed Aug. 19, 2020).
[click to view]

[4] “神华鄂尔多斯108万吨直接煤制油,” 化化网. (accessed Aug. 31, 2020).
[click to view]

[5] “Thirsty Coal 2: Shenhua’s Water Grab,” Jul. 2013. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2020. [Online].
[click to view]

[6] J. Li, “Greenpeace accuses Shenhua of ‘drastic’ groundwater drop ,” South China Morning Post, Jul. 24, 2013. (accessed Aug. 30, 2020).
[click to view]

[7] Greenpeace, “噬水之煤: 神华鄂尔多斯煤制油项目超采地下水和违法排污调查报告,” Jul. 2013. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2020. [Online].
[click to view]

[8] B. Li, “神华煤制油项目与民争水 鄂尔多斯草原生态告急,” 东方财富网, Jul. 26, 2013. (accessed Aug. 26, 2020).
[click to view]

[9] J. Feng, “煤企神华向NGO让步始末 ,” Southern Weekly (南方周末), May 01, 2014. (accessed Aug. 27, 2020).
[click to view]

[10] J. Feng, “How NGOs forced China’s biggest coal company to back down over groundwater extraction,” China Dialogue, May 19, 2014. (accessed Aug. 27, 2020).
[click to view]

[11] “神华煤化工决定将逐步停止抽取鄂尔多斯地下水,” Greenpeace, Apr. 08, 2014. (accessed Aug. 28, 2020).
[click to view]

[12] “绿色和平就神华鄂尔多斯煤制油项目致神华集团的公开信,” Greenpeace, Aug. 27, 2013. (accessed Aug. 27, 2020).
[click to view]

[13] P. Deng and H. Lammi, “Why the world’s biggest coal company has backed down,” Greenpeace , Apr. 08, 2014. (accessed Aug. 26, 2020).
[click to view]

[14] “中国神华香港业绩发布会收到NGO请愿信,” 证券时报网, Sep. 02, 2013. (accessed Aug. 28, 2020).
[click to view]

[15] J. Yang, “专家再呼放开环境公益诉讼主体资格,” Caixin (财新), Oct. 25, 2013. (accessed Aug. 25, 2020).
[click to view]

[16] K. Zhang, “神华两公司被指污染环境 北京内蒙古法院不立案,” 第一财经日报, Oct. 24, 2013. (accessed Aug. 28, 2020).
[click to view]

[17] J.-F. Tremblay, “Conciliatory Words From A Chinese Coal Giant,” Chemical & Engineering News, May 26, 2014. (accessed Aug. 27, 2020).
[click to view]

[18] “煤制油前景看好,国家能源集团再建煤直接液化制油二、三线项目,” 化工网, Aug. 15, 2018. (accessed Aug. 30, 2020).
[click to view]

[19] R. Tao, “一条生产线 煤海变‘油田,’” 中国煤炭网, Apr. 29, 2019. (accessed Aug. 30, 2020).
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:EnvJustice, ICTA-UAB, BW
Last update19/08/2020
Conflict ID:5180
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.